Federal Court of Appeal Sheds Light On Crown Prerogative and Copyright
The Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) recently released its judgment in P.S. Knight Co. Ltd. v. Canadian Standards Association, 2018 FCA 222. The Court examined how the Crown’s rights and privileges apply in the realm of copyright law.
In good news for rights-holders, the majority found that copyright subsists in a work developed by a private organization, even when incorporated by reference into statutes and regulations. However, a strong dissenting opinion argued that the work was a part of the laws of Canada and therefore subject to Crown copyright.
It remains to be seen how the law on this subject will develop going forward.
Background
The case dealt with a claim by the Canadian Standards Association (“CSA”), a federal non-profit which develops, tests and certifies voluntary standards, that P.S. Knight Co. Ltd. (“Knight Co.”) had infringed its copyright over the 2015 CSA Electrical Code (the “Code”). The Code is a voluntary CSA document dealing with electrical safety, which has been adopted by federal, provincial and territorial governments and incorporated by reference into regulation.
In 2016, Knight Co. produced and threatened to distribute CSA’s copyrighted 2015 Code at a third of the price charged by CSA. Consequently, CSA started an application under Rules 61 and 300 of the Federal Courts Rules, and the Copyright Act (the “Act”). Both the Federal Court and the FCA rejected Knight Co.’s arguments, finding that CSA held copyright over the Code and Knight Co.’s conduct infringed upon this right.
Crown Prerogative and Copyright
Knight Co. argued that the Crown possesses copyright in the Code pursuant to section 12 of the Act, which explicitly recognizes Crown copyright in works prepared or published at the control or direction of Her Majesty or any government department. The FCA held that the Code was not prepared under the control or direction of Her Majesty or any government department, noting that the CSA is a private organization.
The Court also rejected the argument that Crown prerogative could be claimed over the Code. Crown prerogative refers to rights and privileges that can be asserted by the federal or provincial Crowns over matters falling within their respective jurisdictions. The majority held that, although a typical defendant may argue that a plaintiff does not own copyright in a work, no one may assert the rights and privileges of the Crown on the Crown’s behalf. They further commented that the Crown’s common law right to print and publish certain works of a legislative nature does not extend to works incorporated by reference into regulations, like the Code.
Webb, J.A., In Dissent
The dissent specifically disagreed on this point. Justice Webb noted that the Code has been incorporated by reference into the Canada Oil and Gas Regulations adopted under the Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act, and non-compliance with the regulations may result in serious penalties. The implications of violating the Code remained the same even if it was merely incorporated by reference. Therefore, he would have held that the Code was part of the laws of Canada, and that Crown prerogative should apply to it in its entirety.
Justice Webb added that the Reproduction of Federal Law Order allows government enactments to be copied by any person, which should extend to regulations and anything incorporated by reference therein, including the Code. On these grounds, he would have allowed Knight Co.’s appeal.
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property
From Paleo to Table: Food Tech Start Up Secures Patents for Heme-Based Proteins
Paleo, a food tech startup, has reportedly secured patents for “precision fermentation heme technology.” Heme is the molecule that is credited with the taste and texture of meat, and, while it is… -
Intellectual Property
Cochlear Increases Volume in Dispute With US University Over Hearing Device Patents
Cochlear, an Australian Biotech Hearing Implant Maker, will fight the University of Pittsburgh’s patent infringement claim that elements of Cochlear’s Nuclear 6 and 7 implant products violated their… -
Intellectual Property
New Patent Application Suggests Valve Could Cut The Cord on Virtual Reality Consoles
Valve, a video game developer and digital distribution company, may be planning a standalone virtual reality (VR) headset, according to PC Gamer. VR fans were excited to learn that Valve… -
Intellectual Property
Allstate Patent Application Speeds Towards More Data Driven Insurance
Allstate has reportedly filed a patent application for technology that would allow a telematics-based driving assessment in real time. While Allstate has aimed this technology at insurers to allow… -
Intellectual Property
Clint Eastwood "Bags" $2.6 Million in CBD Endorsement Case
Clint Eastwood has reportedly succeeded in receiving a default judgment against a CBD retailer for using his name and likeness to promote its products. In the suit, the Hollywood star claimed… -
Intellectual Property
Federal Court of Appeal Weighs in on Limitations of Summary Judgment Procedure
Summary dispositive procedures in patent infringement actions (by way of a motion for summary judgment or a motion for summary trial) have increased in popularity in the Federal Court of Canada over…