.tmb-cfthumb_fb.png?Culture=en&sfvrsn=267a5af4_1)
In a recent decision, the Trademarks Opposition Board (“TMOB”) refused a trademark application for DOGKIND, finding it was confusingly similar to the already registered trademark, PETKIND.
Dogkind Services Inc. sought to register the DOGKIND mark for: (i) animal training, (ii) boarding for animals, and (iii) dog walking services.
PetKind Pet Products Inc. opposed registration, claiming it would likely cause confusion with its PETKIND trademark, which covers pet products, including dog food, and services related to pet ownership, such as workshops and counselling.
TMOB’s decision hinged on an analysis of the factors outlined in Subsection 6(5) of the Trademarks Act, which assesses the likelihood of confusion between trademarks by considering, among other things:
- the inherent distinctiveness of the trademarks and the extent to which they have become known;
- the length of time the trademarks have been in use;
- the nature of the goods and services or business;
- the nature of the trade; and
- the degree of resemblance between the trademarks, including in appearance or sound or the ideas suggested by them.
Although TMOB considered the case to be "at best, borderline," it emphasized that the "legal onus is on the Applicant". TMOB further noted that, given the “similarity between the trademarks,” as well as the “relatedness of the goods, services, and their channels of trade,” it was not persuaded that, on a balance of probabilities, there is not a reasonable likelihood of confusion.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Matthew Stackhouse, 2025 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@jamie452
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
U.S Appeals Court Sends $81 Million Award Against Boeing Flying Back In!
As reported by Reuters, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing, in a suit brought by Zunum Aero, an aircraft startup, accusing Boeing of stealing trade… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On…