
As reported by Reuters, Ferrari has reclaimed legal ownership of the "Testarossa" trademark at the European Union's ("EU") second-highest court, representing a legal victory that may have implications for other legacy brands.
The sports car maker's rights on the mark were revoked in 2023, when the head executive of a German toy company, Autec AG, successfully argued before the EU's Intellectual Property Office ("EUIPO") that Ferrari had not put the Testarossa trademark to "genuine use" for five consecutive years. Under EU law, a trademark can be revoked if not used in commerce for five consecutive years.
In its decision released July 2, 2025, the General Court of the EU's Court of Justice (“ECJ”) annulled the EUIPO's 2023 decision, finding that Ferrari made genuine use of the trademark by implicitly and explicitly sanctioning second-hand sales of Testarossas via its authorized dealer network and by licensing the brand for scale models (i.e., miniature Testarossa models).
According to the Court, these activities constituted genuine trademark use, even though Ferrari discontinued and halted production of the model in 1996. This was because the trademark had served its function by guaranteeing product origin in the resale market.
The ruling set an important precedent for legacy brands: automotive trademarks may remain valid through commercial licensing and sanctioned resales, even without a current production model.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Rebecca Bruni, 2025 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@anewevisual
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule…