As reported by Reuters, Ferrari has reclaimed legal ownership of the "Testarossa" trademark at the European Union's ("EU") second-highest court, representing a legal victory that may have implications for other legacy brands.
The sports car maker's rights on the mark were revoked in 2023, when the head executive of a German toy company, Autec AG, successfully argued before the EU's Intellectual Property Office ("EUIPO") that Ferrari had not put the Testarossa trademark to "genuine use" for five consecutive years. Under EU law, a trademark can be revoked if not used in commerce for five consecutive years.
In its decision released July 2, 2025, the General Court of the EU's Court of Justice (“ECJ”) annulled the EUIPO's 2023 decision, finding that Ferrari made genuine use of the trademark by implicitly and explicitly sanctioning second-hand sales of Testarossas via its authorized dealer network and by licensing the brand for scale models (i.e., miniature Testarossa models).
According to the Court, these activities constituted genuine trademark use, even though Ferrari discontinued and halted production of the model in 1996. This was because the trademark had served its function by guaranteeing product origin in the resale market.
The ruling set an important precedent for legacy brands: automotive trademarks may remain valid through commercial licensing and sanctioned resales, even without a current production model.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Rebecca Bruni, 2025 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@anewevisual
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Regulatory Updates – Impacts of Global Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
US Appeals Court: Supertramp Songwriter Must "Give a Little Bit"
As reported by Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Roger Hodgson, the former Supertramp singer and songwriter, must compensate three former band members for a share of… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have…