As reported by Reuters, Ferrari has reclaimed legal ownership of the "Testarossa" trademark at the European Union's ("EU") second-highest court, representing a legal victory that may have implications for other legacy brands.
The sports car maker's rights on the mark were revoked in 2023, when the head executive of a German toy company, Autec AG, successfully argued before the EU's Intellectual Property Office ("EUIPO") that Ferrari had not put the Testarossa trademark to "genuine use" for five consecutive years. Under EU law, a trademark can be revoked if not used in commerce for five consecutive years.
In its decision released July 2, 2025, the General Court of the EU's Court of Justice (“ECJ”) annulled the EUIPO's 2023 decision, finding that Ferrari made genuine use of the trademark by implicitly and explicitly sanctioning second-hand sales of Testarossas via its authorized dealer network and by licensing the brand for scale models (i.e., miniature Testarossa models).
According to the Court, these activities constituted genuine trademark use, even though Ferrari discontinued and halted production of the model in 1996. This was because the trademark had served its function by guaranteeing product origin in the resale market.
The ruling set an important precedent for legacy brands: automotive trademarks may remain valid through commercial licensing and sanctioned resales, even without a current production model.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Rebecca Bruni, 2025 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@anewevisual
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rock History and Copyright: The Show Goes On
Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission…