Several years ago, drug maker Gilead Science Inc. applied for a Chinese patent for the use of Remdesivir against coronaviruses. Remdesivir was originally intended to treat Ebola but was also shown to inhibit coronaviruses, such as SARS.
Recently, scientists at the government-run Wuhan Institute of Virology, along with a military laboratory, reportedly applied to patent the use of Remdesivir to treat the specific coronavirus, Covid-19, which is being blamed for the recent outbreak.
No decision has been made regarding the Gilead patent application. However, if approved, as a member of the WTO, the Chinese government may be able to use the TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement to obtain a compulsory licence for Remdesivir. If so, the Chinese government would decide, subject to any appeal, what payment Gilead would receive.
In considering the Wuhan Institute’s application, the Chinese patent office will likely have to consider issues of anticipation and obviousness.
For its part, Gilead is helping end the current crisis by working with health authorities. The company is reportedly providing Remdesivir for emergency use in clinical trials.
In vitro studies of Remdesivir and chloroquine have been published in Cell Research, stating that the mixture is effective for inhibiting Covid-19.
Author: Matthew Buck
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@lcma1028
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence…