Mariah Carey Sued (Again) for Holiday Jingle “All I Want for Christmas is You”
Every year, around December, one name comes to mind: Mariah Carey, thanks to her hit song “All I want for Christmas is You”. But this Christmas, Carey faces a renewed lawsuit for copyright infringement, as reported by Billboard.
The complaint was filed by Andy Stone and Troy Powers, who were the singer-songwriters for a song with the same name, released five years before Carey’s hit. The complaint alleges that Carey’s holiday anthem copies their song’s “compositional structure of an extended comparison between a loved one and trappings of seasonal luxury”, as well as its musical elements.
Andy Stone, who goes by the name Vince Vance, initially sued Mariah Carey in June of 2022, causing one member of the Goodmans IP Team to post a special weekend update to express his (overwhelming) concerns. That lawsuit was dropped in November of 2022, without prejudice.
The most recent lawsuit seems to replicate the claims made in the initial complaint, but this time in a different jurisdiction. The new version of the lawsuit also includes greater details about the success of Stone’s version of the jingle and more detailed allegations about the similarities between the two songs. Stone and Powers are seeking $20 million in damages, to account for the revenue Carey’s song has generated over the last 28 years.
Stone is reportedly represented by Gerald P. Fox, the same lawyer who represented the songwriters who accused Taylor Swift of stealing the lyrics to “Shake It Off”. However, the lawsuit against Taylor Swift was dropped, albeit with prejudice, precluding the possibility of it being refiled.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Olivia Moon
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@vmxhu
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…