Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit

The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On,” closing a major chapter in a long-running legal saga.
The lawsuit that the Supreme Court put to rest was initiated in 2018 by Structured Asset Sales (“SAS”), a company which owns partial rights to “Let’s Get It On”. SAS claimed Sheeran’s song used copyright-protected musical elements of Gaye’s composition, including its chord progression, melody, harmony, and rhythm. SAS’s appeal to the Supreme Court followed two decisions from lower courts, which found that the elements were too generic to garner copyright protection.
The Court’s rejection of the appeal is further contextualized by a separate lawsuit filed in 2016 by the heirs of Ed Townsend, a co-writer on “Let’s Get It On,” which focused on similar musical elements in the song’s composition. The high-profile trial occurred in Spring 2023, in which a New York jury sided with Sheeran, after he famously played his guitar on the stand.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to revive SAS’s composition-based lawsuit represents a victory for Sheeran, but Sheeran’s battle is not over yet.
Per U.S. News, SAS has filed another claim, this time concerning the sound recording of “Let’s Get It On,” alleging that Sheeran’s song used protected sonic elements from Gaye’s recorded performance, such as the bass lines, phrasing, and general feel. According to David Pullman, the owner of SAS, “[Sheeran’s] fear has always been the sound recording of 'Let’s Get It On.' The U.S. Supreme Court was aware of this and understands that the case will go forward and may very well be back at the U.S. Supreme Court at a later date”.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Finn Mitra, 2025 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@whitfieldjordan
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@whitfieldjordan
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Europe Rejects "Love" Trademark for Apparel
The European General Court reportedly ruled against a German company, sprd.netrd.net, seeking to trademark an “I love” sign for clothing. The proposed trademark included a red heart symbolizing "love… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Don’t Believe Your Lyin’ Eyes: Denmark’s Battle Against AI Impersonation
As reported in the Guardian, the Danish government has decided to update its copyright laws to address the rise of AI-generated deepfakes. Deepfakes are defined as highly convincing digital replicas… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Ferrari Reclaims "Testarossa" in Legal Grand Prix
As reported by Reuters, Ferrari has reclaimed legal ownership of the "Testarossa" trademark at the European Union's ("EU") second-highest court, representing a legal victory that may have implications…