Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit

The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On,” closing a major chapter in a long-running legal saga.
The lawsuit that the Supreme Court put to rest was initiated in 2018 by Structured Asset Sales (“SAS”), a company which owns partial rights to “Let’s Get It On”. SAS claimed Sheeran’s song used copyright-protected musical elements of Gaye’s composition, including its chord progression, melody, harmony, and rhythm. SAS’s appeal to the Supreme Court followed two decisions from lower courts, which found that the elements were too generic to garner copyright protection.
The Court’s rejection of the appeal is further contextualized by a separate lawsuit filed in 2016 by the heirs of Ed Townsend, a co-writer on “Let’s Get It On,” which focused on similar musical elements in the song’s composition. The high-profile trial occurred in Spring 2023, in which a New York jury sided with Sheeran, after he famously played his guitar on the stand.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to revive SAS’s composition-based lawsuit represents a victory for Sheeran, but Sheeran’s battle is not over yet.
Per U.S. News, SAS has filed another claim, this time concerning the sound recording of “Let’s Get It On,” alleging that Sheeran’s song used protected sonic elements from Gaye’s recorded performance, such as the bass lines, phrasing, and general feel. According to David Pullman, the owner of SAS, “[Sheeran’s] fear has always been the sound recording of 'Let’s Get It On.' The U.S. Supreme Court was aware of this and understands that the case will go forward and may very well be back at the U.S. Supreme Court at a later date”.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Finn Mitra, 2025 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@whitfieldjordan
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@whitfieldjordan
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
U.S Appeals Court Sends $81 Million Award Against Boeing Flying Back In!
As reported by Reuters, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing, in a suit brought by Zunum Aero, an aircraft startup, accusing Boeing of stealing trade… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On…