Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On,” closing a major chapter in a long-running legal saga.
The lawsuit that the Supreme Court put to rest was initiated in 2018 by Structured Asset Sales (“SAS”), a company which owns partial rights to “Let’s Get It On”. SAS claimed Sheeran’s song used copyright-protected musical elements of Gaye’s composition, including its chord progression, melody, harmony, and rhythm. SAS’s appeal to the Supreme Court followed two decisions from lower courts, which found that the elements were too generic to garner copyright protection.
The Court’s rejection of the appeal is further contextualized by a separate lawsuit filed in 2016 by the heirs of Ed Townsend, a co-writer on “Let’s Get It On,” which focused on similar musical elements in the song’s composition. The high-profile trial occurred in Spring 2023, in which a New York jury sided with Sheeran, after he famously played his guitar on the stand.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to revive SAS’s composition-based lawsuit represents a victory for Sheeran, but Sheeran’s battle is not over yet.
Per U.S. News, SAS has filed another claim, this time concerning the sound recording of “Let’s Get It On,” alleging that Sheeran’s song used protected sonic elements from Gaye’s recorded performance, such as the bass lines, phrasing, and general feel. According to David Pullman, the owner of SAS, “[Sheeran’s] fear has always been the sound recording of 'Let’s Get It On.' The U.S. Supreme Court was aware of this and understands that the case will go forward and may very well be back at the U.S. Supreme Court at a later date”.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Finn Mitra, 2025 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@whitfieldjordan
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@whitfieldjordan
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Regulatory Updates – Impacts of Global Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
US Appeals Court: Supertramp Songwriter Must "Give a Little Bit"
As reported by Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Roger Hodgson, the former Supertramp singer and songwriter, must compensate three former band members for a share of… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have…