Peloton Sues Flywheel in High-Tech Fitness Dispute

Peloton Interactive Inc. (“Peloton”), the company known for its in-home cycling bikes, has filed a lawsuit against Flywheel Sports Inc. (“Flywheel”) in the U.S. District Court in Marshall, Texas. Peloton alleges that Flywheel’s newly released FLY Anywhere bike infringes two patents awarded to Peloton’s co-founder and chief executive John Foley.
Peloton’s in-home cycling bikes use technology to display live and archived cycling classes, allowing users to participate in spin classes that mimic the studio experience. The technology also tracks rider performance and compares performance around the world. Peloton alleges that Flywheel’s FLY Anywhere bike uses the same technology to achieve similar goals, namely, providing an on-demand in-home cycling experience that replicates studio classes.
The lawsuit includes a mention of Michael Milken, the financier who famously pleaded guilty to violating securities laws in 1990 (though Mr. Milken is not named as a defendant). According to Peloton, Mr. Milken is one of Flywheel’s largest investors. The claim alleges that he attended a private investment conference for high-net-worth investors three months before Flywheel announced the development of the Fly Anywhere bike. At the conference, Mr. Milken allegedly falsely presented himself to Mr. Foley as a potential investor in Peloton and “pressed for – and obtained – information from Mr. Foley about Peloton’s technology and business strategy – all without ever disclosing his existing multi-million-dollar investment in Flywheel”. It is alleged that Mr. Milken then passed this information on to Flywheel.
The dispute between Peloton and Flywheel illustrates how technology is intensifying competition in the fitness industry. Whether or not Peloton will succeed in forcing Flywheel to cease selling the FLY Anywhere bike remains to be seen.
Author: Steve Inglis
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rolling in the Injunctions: Brazilian judge orders Adele song to be removed from streaming services
A Brazilian judge has reportedly ordered that Adele’s 2015 song, “Million Years Ago”, be pulled from streaming services worldwide, following allegations of plagiarism from Brazilian musician, Toninho… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Changes to Trademark Proceedings Coming into Effect April 1, 2025
Amendments to the Trademarks Regulations will take effect on April 1, 2025. These changes are part of broader updates to the Trademarks Act, introduced through the Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Heineken Battles Over "La Tropical" Branding
Heineken’s Lagunitas Brewery has reportedly advanced its trademark and copyright claims over its "La Tropical" beer in a legal battle involving Cuban-origin brands. As reported by Bloomberg, the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Super Loss for Marvel and DC? "Super Hero" Trademark Enters the Public Domain
Marvel and DC have reportedly lost their long-held trademarks for “Super Hero”. For decades, the two comic giants jointly owned the trademark, with DC using it for its DC Super Hero Cafe and… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Is Your Trademark at Risk? Understanding the TMOB’s New Pilot Project
In January 2025, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) is launching a pilot project in which the Registrar of Trademarks will issue 50–100 section 45 notices per month for randomly selected trademark… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rise of Trademark Phishing Scams
There has been a reported surge in trademark phishing scams. The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) issued a statement warning of an email phishing scam targeting members of the public by…