Special Weekend Update: Mariah Carey Sued over "All I Want for Christmas is You"
There are some intellectual property law events that are so culturally important that they cannot wait for a weekday update. They deserve a special weekend update. This is one of them.
As reported just about everywhere (here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), Mariah Carey has been sued for copyright infringement related to her 1994-released Christmas anthem, "All I Want for Christmas is You". The infectious, upbeat love song has been played and sung by lovestruck romantics every Christmas season for over a quarter century and has been popularized in television shows and films, including famously in "Love Actually". The song has reportedly been streamed more than one billion times on Spotify alone.
Who, then, is the "Scrooge" seeking to sour our collective cultural (and romantic) joy? A copy of the complaint, which can be accessed here, reveals that the plaintiff is Andy Stone a.k.a. "Vince Vance", who is a member of "Vince Vance & The Valiants", a country, pop, rock and roll and novelty musical group from New Orleans. The Valiants released their own song called "All I Want for Christmas is You" in 1989 and then again in 1993. The song reportedly had some modest success on the country singles charts.
The complaint alleges that, after The Valiants' version of the song received extensive airplay during the Christmas season in 1993, Mariah Carey and her co-writer copied it in the course of developing their own version of the song, which was released on October 28, 1994. The songs have different lyrics and melodies.
The complaint was brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Needless to say, the Goodmans IP Team (or at least the undersigned) will be monitoring developments very closely and hoping that this dispute will be resolved by the Christmas season of 2022.
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@melpoole
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…