Special Weekend Update: Mariah Carey Sued over "All I Want for Christmas is You"

There are some intellectual property law events that are so culturally important that they cannot wait for a weekday update. They deserve a special weekend update. This is one of them.
As reported just about everywhere (here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), Mariah Carey has been sued for copyright infringement related to her 1994-released Christmas anthem, "All I Want for Christmas is You". The infectious, upbeat love song has been played and sung by lovestruck romantics every Christmas season for over a quarter century and has been popularized in television shows and films, including famously in "Love Actually". The song has reportedly been streamed more than one billion times on Spotify alone.
Who, then, is the "Scrooge" seeking to sour our collective cultural (and romantic) joy? A copy of the complaint, which can be accessed here, reveals that the plaintiff is Andy Stone a.k.a. "Vince Vance", who is a member of "Vince Vance & The Valiants", a country, pop, rock and roll and novelty musical group from New Orleans. The Valiants released their own song called "All I Want for Christmas is You" in 1989 and then again in 1993. The song reportedly had some modest success on the country singles charts.
The complaint alleges that, after The Valiants' version of the song received extensive airplay during the Christmas season in 1993, Mariah Carey and her co-writer copied it in the course of developing their own version of the song, which was released on October 28, 1994. The songs have different lyrics and melodies.
The complaint was brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Needless to say, the Goodmans IP Team (or at least the undersigned) will be monitoring developments very closely and hoping that this dispute will be resolved by the Christmas season of 2022.
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
U.S Appeals Court Sends $81 Million Award Against Boeing Flying Back In!
As reported by Reuters, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing, in a suit brought by Zunum Aero, an aircraft startup, accusing Boeing of stealing trade… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce…