
Wings to ground a motorcycle; that is what Aprilia’s newly published patent application describes. According to the patent application, Aprilia’s system helps plant motorbikes on the ground and around corners at high speeds. This is made possible by an “aerodynamic force” created on the rear wheel, “improving the grip of the bike”. While the patent application was published recently, the document was filed with patent authorities in and around 2022, when Aprilia first unveiled its RS-GP MotoGP bike.
This patent application is likely not intended for racing for two main reasons.
- First, a patent requires a detailed explanation of the idea which is not ideal for a competitive environment.
- Second, even if the patent is granted, it may be unsportsmanlike in the world of MotoGP to use patent law to beat out the competition. The likely rationale for the patent application is to protect the idea for future production models to be used on the road by consumers.
Since the advantages noted in the patent application can likely only be gained on the racetrack, there is reportedly skepticism regarding whether Aprilia’s patent application is of any practical value.
Critics reportedly note that, if the technology described in the patent application is intended to prevent other manufacturers from selling similar commercially available motorbikes, then there needs to be a practical benefit on the road. Instead, they reportedly argue that the rear wing will make strapping luggage onto the rear bumper for daily use difficult, if not impossible, making the invention less practical.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Olivia Moon
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New…