X’s Lawsuit Regarding Data Scraping Dismissed
A federal judge in California reportedly dismissed a lawsuit for breach-of-contract and tort claims brought by Elon Musk’s X, formerly known as Twitter, against Bright Data, in a case involving data scraping.
X reportedly alleged that Bright Data was taking data from its platform and selling it, employing methods to evade X’s anti-scraping technology, and violating its terms of service and copyright.
Data scraping is the process of extracting large volumes of data from publicly available web sources. The data is cleaned and prepared for processing and can serve several purposes such as training artificial intelligence models, targeting online advertisements, or conducting market research.
According to X, Bright Data was going to elaborate measures to evade its anti-scraping technology, and in doing so, violated X’s user agreement.
While data-scraping is controversial, the judge cautioned of the potential information monopoly and the disservice to the public if social media companies were to enjoy an unchecked authority over the use of public data. Ultimately, the judge rejected X’s argument of de facto copyright ownership over user-generated content made available to the public.
Bright Data CEO, Or Lenchner, reportedly made the following statement after hearing the decision: “Bright Data has proven that ethical and transparent scraping practices for legitimate business use and social good initiatives are legally sound. Companies that try to control user data intended for public consumption will not win this legal battle.”
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rock History and Copyright: The Show Goes On
Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Patent Reinstatement Throws “Glory” Cherries in the Pits
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (“District Court”) reportedly reinstated the Canadian government’s patent for the “Staccato” cherry, developed by Agriculture and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the…