Trademarks Opposition Board Announces Upcoming Changes to Extensions of Time
On December 1, 2023, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) will be implementing changes to two of its practice notices: (1) Practice in trademark opposition proceedings; and (2) Practice in section 45 proceedings.
By shortening the timelines in trademark opposition and summary expungement proceedings, the changes are intended to promote timeliness and efficiency. In particular, the TMOB intends to reduce the current benchmarks for extensions of time and the cooling off period after the initial statutory extensions.
While already fixed deadlines and previously submitted extension requests will be unaffected, requests received on or after December 1 will be subject to the new schedules.
Changes to Opposition Proceedings
The amended timelines with respect to various stages of an opposition beyond the initial statutory deadlines are outlined below. Notably, the maximum amount of time permitted for “cooling off” (to allow for settlement discussions) will decrease from 9 months to 7 months.
- Statement of Opposition: extensions to file a statement of opposition will decrease from 4 months to 2 months.
- Counterstatement: the corresponding extension to file a counterstatement will be 1 month instead of 2 months.
- Filing Evidence with Other Party’s Consent: extensions of time to file primary evidence will drop from 3 months to 2 months.
- Reply Evidence: extensions of time for an applicant to file reply evidence will drop from 4 months to 1 month.
- Cross-Examination: the period to conduct a cross-examination will be 2 months instead of 4 months.
- Written Representations: opponents and applicants will only have an extension of 1 month (with the other party’s consent) to submit written representations as opposed to the previously allocated 2 months.
Changes to Summary Cancellation Proceedings
Under s. 45 of the Trademarks Act, a trademark registration may be expunged from the Register if the owner is unable to show use of the trademark in Canada during the three-year period preceding the s. 45 notice, and there are no special circumstances justifying the non-use.
The upcoming changes to s. 45 proceedings compress the time a registrant has to demonstrate use (or provide adequate reasons explaining the lack of use). Under the new practice notice, owners will only have a maximum of 2 months (in addition to the baseline 3-month deadline to file evidence) instead of the previously allotted 4-month benchmark.
Extraordinary Circumstances
For both opposition and s. 45 proceedings, the TMOB has also introduced an “acting diligently” requirement to obtain an extension based on “extraordinary circumstances”. The party must ultimately demonstrate a “consistent overall pattern of reasonable effort, promptness, and diligence” in their efforts to meet the upcoming deadline. Requests must explain why meeting the deadline is not possible and set out the actions taken prior to the deadline to meet it.
The following examples are recognized by the TMOB as exceptional circumstances: an inadvertent error or omission by a party or agent; inherently lengthy process of evidence preparation; and unavailability of relevant deponents due to involvement in other matters, if the party has exhausted all efforts to find alternative deponents. Importantly, delay resulting from ongoing settlement negotiations (e.g., due to negotiating terms or drafting agreements) will not assist the party in showing they acted diligently.
Looking Forward
The new changes mean that brand owners will have to act more promptly in all stages of opposition and cancellation proceedings. Those interested in preserving longer extensions of time should file such requests before the December 1, 2023 effective date.
For further information concerning the changes, please contact any member of our Intellectual Property Group.
The authors would like to thank Emily Groper, Articling Student-At-Law, for her assistance in writing this Update.
Authors
Insights
-
Intellectual Property
Bacardí Toasts to a Successful Appeal
There has been a new development in a long-standing trademark dispute between Bacardí and the Cuban government entity, Cubaexport, over the "Havana Club" name. Bacardí won its appeal at the US… -
Intellectual Property
Warhol: Landmark Copyright Case Settles
The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts has reportedly agreed to settle a copyright infringement proceeding with Lynn Goldsmith over a photograph of Prince that Goldsmith claimed Andy Warhol… -
Intellectual Property
Boeing Lawsuit Blasts Off: Virgin Galactic Accused of Stealing Trade Secrets
Boeing and its subsidiary, Aurora Flight Sciences, are reportedly suing Virgin Galactic, a space tourism start-up, for allegedly misappropriating trade secrets and failing to pay $25 million for work… -
Intellectual Property
All Posts Game, Set, Match: Sony PlayStation Victorious in Patent Infringement Lawsuit
In 2017, Genuine Enabling Technology (“GET”) filed a complaint against the Sony Corporation (“Sony”), which included a claim that Sony infringed one of its patents related to a method of communication… -
Intellectual Property
Goodmans Wins Leading IP Law Firm – IP Patents at the Lexology Awards: North America 2024
We are proud to share Goodmans has won Leading IP Law Firm - IP Patents at the Lexology Awards: North America 2024. These awards celebrate outstanding achievements and world class client… -
Intellectual Property
Protecting Heads and the Ideas Inside: Yamaha’s Augmented Reality Helmet
A Yamaha patent application has been published for a new design of an augmented reality (AR) motorcycle helmet. The design introduces transparent lenses, which aim to combine the power of the AR…
Featured Work
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex Inc. acquires Searchlight Pharma Inc.
Goodmans LLP advised Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of Searchlight Pharma Inc… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
FASHIONPHILE acquires Two Authenticators Business
Goodmans LLP acted for FASHIONPHILE, LLC in connection with its purchase of the assets of Two Authenticators Inc… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Minute Media acquires STN Video
Goodmans LLP acted for Minute Media, a leading global technology and sports content company, in relation to its acquisition of STN Video, a North American industry leader in sports content… -
Banking and Financial Services
Finastra Group $5.32 billion refinancing
Goodmans LLP acted for Finastra International Limited in the full refinancing of its existing credit facilities and restructuring of its capital structure… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Coinsquare, WonderFi and CoinSmart close business combination
Goodmans LLP acted for Coinsquare Ltd. in its business combination transaction with WonderFi Technologies Inc. and CoinSmart Financial Inc… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Docebo Inc. acquires Edugo.AI
Goodmans LLP acted for Docebo Inc. (“Docebo”) in its acquisition of Edugo.AI (“Edugo”), a Generative AI-based Learning Technology that uses advanced Large Language Models and algorithms to optimize…
News & Events
-
Intellectual Property
Jenene Roberts at IPIC's Refusals Motions in the Federal Courts – Strategies for IP Lawyers
Join Jenene Roberts on September 10th at 1:00 pm for the Refusals Motions in the Federal Courts – Strategies for IP Lawyers webinar with the Intellectual Property Institute of… -
Intellectual Property
Goodmans Awarded at the Lexology Awards: North America 2024
We are proud to share Goodmans has won Leading IP Law Firm - IP Patents at the Lexology Awards: North America 2024. These awards celebrate outstanding achievements and world class client service… -
Technology
Goodmans Recognized in the Lexpert Special Edition: Technology and Health Sciences 2024
We are delighted to announce the Lexpert Special Edition: Technology and Health Sciences 2024 once again features Goodmans lawyers among Canada's top-ranked experts.Congratulations to…