Recently-crowned seven-time champion, Lewis Hamilton, may be one of the greatest Formula One drivers of all time. While the athlete rarely loses on the race track, he is facing defeat in a new arena. As reported by ESPN, Lewis Hamilton has lost a three-year legal battle over Hamilton International’s trademark, ‘Hamilton’.
In 2017, Lewis Hamilton’s company, 44IP, initiated the application to invalidate Hamilton International’s mark in Europe. The F1 driver had plans to develop his own line of timepieces and his company argued that Hamilton International appropriated the trademark in bad faith, with the aim of preventing fair competition.
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) rejected the company’s submissions on the basis that “there is no natural right for a person to have his name registered as a trademark when that would infringe third parties’ rights”. The court noted that the contested mark could be traced as far back as Hamilton International’s inception in 1892, close to a century before the F1 driver was even born.
Since that time, Hamilton International has supplied watches to WW1 military personnel and even styled Elvis Presley during his role in the 1961 film Blue Hawaii. According to the Daily Mail, Hamilton International is now exclusively entitled to utilize the Hamilton trademark on accessories throughout Europe.
While EUIPO may have waived the checkered flag to close this legal battle, something tells us the F1 legend, who famously has the words “Still I Rise” tattooed across his back and on his helmet, will drive on.
Authors: Meghan King and Maddie Warren
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@milandegraeve
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…