Federal Court Reiterates High Standard for Excluding Expert Evidence at Preliminary Motions
The Federal Court’s recent decision in McCain Foods Limited v J.R. Simplot Company, 2023 FC 1480 provides further clarity on rule 52.5 of the Federal Court Rules (the “Rules”). Rule 52.5 (1) provides that parties must raise disqualifying objections regarding expert witnesses as early as possible:
52.5 (1) A party to a proceeding shall, as early as possible in the proceeding, raise any objection to an opposing party’s proposed expert witness that could disqualify the witness from testifying.
The action underlying this decision is a patent infringement action where McCain Foods Limited (“McCain”) asserts that J.R. Simplot Company (“Simplot”) infringed their patent directed to a process for treating fruits and vegetables before cooking. In June 2023, Simplot served the expert reports of Dr. Vorobiev and Dr. Sastry. Under rule 52.5, McCain objected to the expert report of Dr. Vorobiev.
Subsequently, McCain brought a motion to strike Dr. Vorobiev’s report and sought the determination on the merits of their objections to Dr. Voroviev’s evidence. The Court was asked to determine if rule 52.5 of the Rules requires prompt resolution on the merits of whether an expert witness's evidence is admissible.
The Court dismissed McCain’s motion. The Court held that the Rules do not require a motion to be brought as early as possible to determine the merits of any objections to expert evidence or the admissibility of an expert’s report. Instead, the notice requirement in rule 52.5 serves to ensure that no party is taken by surprise.
The Court acknowledged that a case management judge does possess the authority to strike expert evidence during a pre-trial motion. However, the Court warned that a case management judge should exercise such authority sparingly and only when the moving party lands a “knockout punch”.
Authors: Yaseen Manan and Josh Sloan, 2023/2024 Articling Student-At-Law
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property
From Touchdowns to Trademarks: How NFL Star Travis Kelce is Growing his Brand
Travis Kelce, three-time Super Bowl champion and Kansas City Chiefs superstar tight-end, has reportedly filed multiple new trademark applications in Ohio according to records from the United States… -
Intellectual Property
A Bump in the Road: Caterpillar Ordered to Pay Wirtgen $12.9 Million in Patent Trial
The federal jury of a U.S. District Court in Delaware reportedly awarded Wirtgen America Inc. (“Wirtgen”) $12.9 million in damages for patent infringement related to road-construction technology.The… -
Intellectual Property
A Billion-Dollar Remix: U.S. Appeal Court Overturns $1 Billion Copyright Verdict
A U.S. appeal court reportedly found in favour of American telecommunications and internet service provider, Cox Communications (“Cox”), overturning a $1 billion jury verdict awarded to several record… -
Intellectual Property
From Foam to Fortune: Crocs Inc. Prevails in Patent Infringement Case
Crocs Inc. has been awarded over $6 million following a decision regarding patent infringement by USA Dawgs and its subsidiary Double Diamond Distribution. Crocs was embroiled in years of litigation… -
Intellectual Property
Dish and iFit Reach the Finish Line Settling Infringement Dispute
Dish Network and iFit have reportedly reached an agreement to settle their legal disputes over the use of Dish Network’s streaming-video technology in iFit’s exercise equipment. The dispute arose… -
Intellectual Property
General Motors Files Patent Application for Foldable Ramp for Pickup Trucks
General Motors (“GM”) has reportedly filed a patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for a foldable ramp designed for pickup trucks.The foldable ramp is designed to…