
In May 2019, Gibson filed a lawsuit against Armadillo Enterprises Inc. (“Armadillo”), the parent company of Dean Guitars (“Dean”), accusing the instrument manufacturer of infringing on its guitar body shape and headstock design trademarks. Gibson also alleged that Armadillo engaged in trademark counterfeiting – specifically, that Armadillo was attempting to pass off guitars with a similar design that it manufactured as being affiliated with Gibson.
Armadillo denied the accusations, arguing that Gibson was trying to claim exclusive rights to commonplace guitar shapes. Armadillo also countersued Gibson for tortious interference with Armadillo's contracts.
On May 27, 2022, a Texas jury rejected Armadillo's claims that Gibson's designs in question were “generic” and “unprotectable,” and found Armadillo infringed on Gibson's body shape trademarks for four different models of guitar, the Dove Wing headstock and the name of the Hummingbird acoustic guitar. However, the court also found that Gibson’s “inexcusable” delay in asserting its trademark rights caused undue prejudice to Armadillo. As a result, the court held that Gibson had suffered no actual damages, and awarded Gibson only $4,000 in statutory damages.
The parties involved have different interpretations about the implications of this ruling. Gibson claims their “iconic” guitar shapes are now “firmly protected”, while Armadillo CEO Evan Rubinson praised the jury for issuing a judgement in the amount of $4,000, a “mere fraction of the $7 million-plus originally sought by Gibson.”
As Gibson is in the midst of trademark disputes with other brands, such as Heritage Guitars and Kiesel, this verdict could potentially have broader implications for other companies producing instruments with the popular Gibson outline.
Authors: Mark Leonard and Eyitayo Kunle-Oladosu, 2022 Student Intern
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New…