In the world of intellectual property, the line between inspiration and infringement is not always easily drawn. While seminal cases have produced a bounty of guiding principles to help creatives delineate between paying homage and plagiarism, every so often a new case arises to challenge these boundaries.
The latest chapter in the inspiration vs. infringement saga centers around game developer Pocketpair’s recent online sensation, "Palworld". The game has taken the internet by storm, making waves in the gaming community and piquing the interest of intellectual property enthusiasts for its potential infringement of Nintendo’s Pokémon franchise.
Palworld is an open world survival game which invites players to “fight, farm, build and work alongside mysterious creatures called Pals” – creatures which many players were quick to notice bear a striking resemblance to many of Nintendo’s Pokémon designs. While many would have assumed that this alone would have been sufficient to provoke the ire of Nintendo, which has developed a reputation for its litigiousness, the similarities do not end there.
In Palworld, Pals are captured using "Pal Spheres", the design and mechanics of which are highly reminiscent of Nintendo’s "Pokéballs". The similarities between the two properties are so strong that some on the internet have been quick to dub Palworld as “Pokémon with guns”.
In response to the outcry, The Pokémon Company (the Nintendo subsidiary which manages the Pokémon IP) announced in January that it had not granted permission for use of its Pokémon IP or assets. The company noted its intention to launch an investigation into the allegations of plagiarism and to “take appropriate measures” if it determined that any of its IP rights had been infringed.
Pocketpair CEO, Takuro Mizobe, posted a response to the plagiarism accusations via X (formerly Twitter), but has not formally denied the allegations at the time of writing this update.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Roy Friedman, 2023/2024 Articling Student-At-Law
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Regulatory Updates – Impacts of Global Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
US Appeals Court: Supertramp Songwriter Must "Give a Little Bit"
As reported by Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Roger Hodgson, the former Supertramp singer and songwriter, must compensate three former band members for a share of… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
U.S Appeals Court Sends $81 Million Award Against Boeing Flying Back In!
As reported by Reuters, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing, in a suit brought by Zunum Aero, an aircraft startup, accusing Boeing of stealing trade… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York…