
Back in December 2018, Nirvana LLC sued Marc Jacobs for copyright infringement after the fashion brand released merchandise featuring smiley face graphics that bore a strong resemblance to the grunge band’s black and yellow “happy face” logo that uses two X's as eyes. The only difference between Nirvana and Marc Jacobs’ graphics was that Marc Jacobs used the letters ‘M’ and ‘J’ as eyes in place of the two X's. The lawsuit alleges that, due to Marc Jacobs’ wrongful actions, Nirvana has suffered irreparable injuries and the value of its licenses are at risk of dilution.
In response, Marc Jacobs brought a motion to have the claim dismissed on the basis that Nirvana’s copyright did not cover the use of M and J instead of the two X's. This motion was ultimately denied in a decision issued by the United States District Court on November 8, 2019.
Following the unsuccessful motion to dismiss, Marc Jacobs has now counterclaimed against Nirvana, alleging that the complaint is “invalid and unenforceable” because the logo is composed of familiar symbols, designs, words, and phrases. Marc Jacobs also argues that Nirvana should be estopped from claiming any infringement due to the fact that Courtney Love, widow of Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain, was in negotiations with Marc Jacobs to become involved in the release of the merchandise at issue.
Author: Megan Brooks
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Europe Rejects "Love" Trademark for Apparel
The European General Court reportedly ruled against a German company, sprd.netrd.net, seeking to trademark an “I love” sign for clothing. The proposed trademark included a red heart symbolizing "love…