Back in December 2018, Nirvana LLC sued Marc Jacobs for copyright infringement after the fashion brand released merchandise featuring smiley face graphics that bore a strong resemblance to the grunge band’s black and yellow “happy face” logo that uses two X's as eyes. The only difference between Nirvana and Marc Jacobs’ graphics was that Marc Jacobs used the letters ‘M’ and ‘J’ as eyes in place of the two X's. The lawsuit alleges that, due to Marc Jacobs’ wrongful actions, Nirvana has suffered irreparable injuries and the value of its licenses are at risk of dilution.
In response, Marc Jacobs brought a motion to have the claim dismissed on the basis that Nirvana’s copyright did not cover the use of M and J instead of the two X's. This motion was ultimately denied in a decision issued by the United States District Court on November 8, 2019.
Following the unsuccessful motion to dismiss, Marc Jacobs has now counterclaimed against Nirvana, alleging that the complaint is “invalid and unenforceable” because the logo is composed of familiar symbols, designs, words, and phrases. Marc Jacobs also argues that Nirvana should be estopped from claiming any infringement due to the fact that Courtney Love, widow of Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain, was in negotiations with Marc Jacobs to become involved in the release of the merchandise at issue.
Author: Megan Brooks
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@timmossholder
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Browsing for Trouble? Intuit Defends Synchronized Browser Patent Infringement Claim
Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), the owner of accounting software, TurboTax, has reportedly successfully defended against a claim alleging that TurboTax’s co-browsing feature infringes a patent owned by… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CanLII and Caseway Reportedly Settle AI Copyright Dispute
As recently reported by Canadian Lawyer Magazine, CanLII has settled its copyright infringement action against AI-powered legal assistant, Caseway AI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, but… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Cut, Sew, but Don’t Sell: South Korea’s Supreme Court Clarifies Trademark Limits
As recently reported by Korea JoongAng Daily, South Korea’s Supreme Court (second division) has issued its first decision regarding whether “upcycling” or customizing branded luxury goods can amount… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a…