Back in December 2018, Nirvana LLC sued Marc Jacobs for copyright infringement after the fashion brand released merchandise featuring smiley face graphics that bore a strong resemblance to the grunge band’s black and yellow “happy face” logo that uses two X's as eyes. The only difference between Nirvana and Marc Jacobs’ graphics was that Marc Jacobs used the letters ‘M’ and ‘J’ as eyes in place of the two X's. The lawsuit alleges that, due to Marc Jacobs’ wrongful actions, Nirvana has suffered irreparable injuries and the value of its licenses are at risk of dilution.
In response, Marc Jacobs brought a motion to have the claim dismissed on the basis that Nirvana’s copyright did not cover the use of M and J instead of the two X's. This motion was ultimately denied in a decision issued by the United States District Court on November 8, 2019.
Following the unsuccessful motion to dismiss, Marc Jacobs has now counterclaimed against Nirvana, alleging that the complaint is “invalid and unenforceable” because the logo is composed of familiar symbols, designs, words, and phrases. Marc Jacobs also argues that Nirvana should be estopped from claiming any infringement due to the fact that Courtney Love, widow of Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain, was in negotiations with Marc Jacobs to become involved in the release of the merchandise at issue.
Author: Megan Brooks
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rock History and Copyright: The Show Goes On
Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Patent Reinstatement Throws “Glory” Cherries in the Pits
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (“District Court”) reportedly reinstated the Canadian government’s patent for the “Staccato” cherry, developed by Agriculture and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed…