
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New York Post, the group claims that UMG is violating copyright law by refusing to turn over the rights to their master recordings. Salt-N-Pepa are seeking damages that could exceed $1 million USD as well as punitive damages.
Cheryl James (“Salt”) and Sandra Denton (“Pepa”) filed the lawsuit in federal court in New York, asserting that the Copyright Act of 1976 now entitles them to reclaim full ownership of their recordings. The law allows artists to terminate old agreements and regain rights to their work after a set period of time. In particular, section 203 entitles authors to terminate past copyright transfers and is intended to protect artists who may have entered into unfavorable contracts early in their careers, before the long-term value or success of their work was fully realized.
According to the lawsuit, “UMG has indicated that it will hold Plaintiffs’ rights hostage even if it means tanking the value of Plaintiffs’ music catalogue and depriving their fans of access to their work”. UMG’s supposed position is that the recordings are “works made for hire”, meaning that an employer or commissioner, not the artist, owns the copyright for the creative work from the moment the works were created. If this is the case, Salt-N-Pepa would be unable to reclaim the rights to their music.
Salt-N-Pepa redefined the world of hip hop, becoming the first female rap group to win a Grammy and later earning a Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award in 2021. Whether they will succeed in reclaiming the rights to their work remains to be seen.
Authors: Emily Groper and Ehitohameh Oware, 2025 Summer Intern
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@caaaaaaaaaio
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@caaaaaaaaaio
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
U.S Appeals Court Sends $81 Million Award Against Boeing Flying Back In!
As reported by Reuters, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing, in a suit brought by Zunum Aero, an aircraft startup, accusing Boeing of stealing trade… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce…