Canada Added to U.S. Intellectual Property Priority Watch List
On April 27, 2018, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) added Canada to a “Priority Watch List” of countries it says fail to protect and enforce intellectual property (IP) rights.
What Happened?
The USTR publishes an annual “Special 301 Report” (the “Report”) for the U.S. Congress that evaluates the state of IP protection around the world. It does so with a view to identifying countries with shortcomings said to negatively affect U.S. interests. In developing the Report, the USTR seeks input from IP-related businesses and associations in the U.S., as well as U.S. embassies abroad. A country the USTR deems to insufficiently protect IP rights may be listed on the USTR’s “Watch List” or “Priority Watch List”, the latter reserved for what the USTR deems to be the worst offenders.
Canada has been on the Watch List for many years, but has not been on the Priority Watch List since 2012.
The USTR criticized Canada for what it called a “failure to resolve key longstanding deficiencies in protection and enforcement of IP”, including:
- poor border and law enforcement with respect to preventing counterfeit or pirated goods from being shipped though Canada;
- a weak patent and pricing environment for innovative pharmaceuticals;
- deficient copyright protection; and
- inadequate transparency regarding the protection of geographic indications of origin.
Canada joins only 11 other countries, including Algeria, China, India, Russia, and Venezuela, on the Priority Watch List. Canada is the only G7 country on the list.
What led to Canada’s re-classification?
The move to put Canada on the Priority Watch List must be viewed in the context of the ongoing negotiations between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico over the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The U.S. has been demanding stronger IP protections be included in a renewed NAFTA pact. The Report specifically noted the USTR’s efforts to seek stronger IP protections in the renegotiation of NAFTA, and the press release accompanying the Report noted Canada’s IP protection will be a continuing priority in bilateral trade relations during the coming year.
Canada’s re-classification comes on the heels of recent efforts by Canada to boost IP protection. The day before it was put on the Priority Watch List, Canada introduced a new IP strategy with the stated goal of helping Canadians “understand, protect and access intellectual property” (for more details on this new IP strategy, please see our May 9, 2018 Update, Canada Unveils its Intellectual Property Strategy). Canada also amended its anti-counterfeiting legislation in 2014 to increase powers for border officials. Further, in 2017, Canada amended the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations to, among other things, offer increased patent protection for certain innovative pharmaceuticals, as a result of Canada’s implementation of the Canada-European Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).
What does it mean for IP in Canada?
The short-term implications of Canada’s re-classification to the Priority Watch List are likely minimal. Canadian policy-makers have, in the past, given the USTR classification little credence (at least publicly). The official government position is that the USTR process and report are analytically flawed due to their reliance on U.S. industry allegations rather than objective empirical evidence.
That said, the move is clearly intended as a nudge to Canadian lawmakers to strengthen IP protections, and may be a signal as to the U.S.’s intentions in the NAFTA renegotiation. Whether the USTR move is a negotiation tactic that is ultimately temporary or is rooted in a legitimate criticism of Canadian laws, the Canadian government may re-evaluate its IP protections in response, particularly if required as a result of the NAFTA renegotiation.
However, whether increased IP protection would be a positive shift is a matter of perspective. For example, the Parliamentary Budget Office recently estimated that the enhanced patent protections implemented as a result of CETA will add hundreds of millions of dollars to Canadian health care and pharmaceutical costs. Canadian lawmakers must be alive to the balance that must be achieved between heightened IP protection and fair access to Canadian and international IP.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Browsing for Trouble? Intuit Defends Synchronized Browser Patent Infringement Claim
Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), the owner of accounting software, TurboTax, has reportedly successfully defended against a claim alleging that TurboTax’s co-browsing feature infringes a patent owned by… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CanLII and Caseway Reportedly Settle AI Copyright Dispute
As recently reported by Canadian Lawyer Magazine, CanLII has settled its copyright infringement action against AI-powered legal assistant, Caseway AI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, but… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Cut, Sew, but Don’t Sell: South Korea’s Supreme Court Clarifies Trademark Limits
As recently reported by Korea JoongAng Daily, South Korea’s Supreme Court (second division) has issued its first decision regarding whether “upcycling” or customizing branded luxury goods can amount… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a…
Featured Work
-
REITS and Income Securities
Minto Apartment REIT completes going-private transaction with Crestpoint and Minto Group
Goodmans LLP acted for Minto Apartment Real Estate Investment Trust (the “REIT”) in connection with its going-private transaction with Crestpoint Real Estate Investments Limited Partnership… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Jamieson Wellness to be acquired by Kirin Holdings in a deal valued at approximately C$2.5 billion
Goodmans LLP is acting for Jamieson Wellness Inc. in connection with its definitive arrangement agreement with Kirin Holdings Company, Limited, pursuant to which Kirin has agreed to acquire all of the… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Onex Partners and co-investors to acquire AirSprint
Goodmans LLP is acting as M&A legal counsel to Onex Partners in connection with the acquisition of AirSprint Inc. by Onex and its co-investors… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
HoudiniSwap acquired by Sol Strategies for US$18 million
Goodman LLP advised HoudiniSwap LLC in connection with its acquisition by Sol Strategies for US$18 million… -
Mining
Coeur Mining, Inc. acquires New Gold Inc. for US$7 billion
Goodmans LLP acted for Coeur Mining, Inc. in connection with its acquisition of New Gold Inc. for US$7 billion… -
Private Equity
Dayforce taken private by Thoma Bravo for US$12.3 billion
Goodmans LLP advised Dayforce, Inc. as Canadian counsel in connection with its acquisition by Thoma Bravo in an all-cash transaction with an enterprise value of US$12.3 billion…
News & Events
-
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Goodmans Partner Recognized in the 2026 Benchmark Litigation 40 & Under List - Canada
Goodmans is delighted to congratulate Jaclyn Tilak who has been honoured in the 11th edition of Benchmark Litigation's 40 & Under List – Canada.Jaclyn Tilak is a Partner in the Litigation and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Goodmans Honoured in the 2026 Edition of Managing IP’s IP STARS
We are proud to announce the 2026 edition of Managing IP’s IP STARS has recognized Goodmans in Tier 1 for our strengths in Patent Disputes for the ninth year in a row. Our Intellectual Property… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Jordan Scopa Quoted in Canadian Lawyer on Patent Litigation in Canada
Goodmans Partner Jordan Scopa shares his insights in Canadian Lawyer’s article on patent litigation in Canada.He discusses why Canada is an attractive jurisdiction for patent litigation, pointing to…